Testseek.com have collected 993 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3.
June 2012
(87%)
993 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(88%)
22 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
870100993
The editors liked
Fast as a bullet
Amazing screen resolution and brightness
Fantastic camera optics
Fast focus
Slim and light
Great audio quality
Smooth navigation throughout the OS
Efficient use of power
Excellent camera (for a phone)
Ergonomic design
Huge
Bright
Clear display
Insanely fast Superb screen Quadcore goodness Jelly Bean out of the box
The Samsung Galaxy S3 comes fully loaded with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
4G LTE capability
A zippy dual-core processor
And a strong 8-megapixel camera. S Beam is an excellent software enhancement
And the handset's price is right
The Samsung Galaxy S III (S3) comes fully loaded with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
Excellent 4G speeds
Slick and fast software
Same great display and design
Excellent battery life
Superb screen
Quad core speed
Top media management
Same great Galaxy S3 design. Great 4.7-inch screen. 4G data speeds
Outstanding battery life. Great display. Zippy performance. Great suite of features
The editors didn't like
Poor call quality
Poor build quality
Screen is useless in sunlight
Battery charges slowly
Home button is awkward to press
TouchWiz deviates too far from ICS “Holo Theme”
No 4G or DC-HSPA+
Bland design
Auto-brightness is too jumpy
And low
What we like
Battery life S Voice still useless Subjective design
The Galaxy S3's screen is too dim
And Samsung's Siri competitor
S Voice
Disappointed us. You can only roam at 3G speeds outside of U.S. Cellular's home network
Disappointed. Until Sprint's LTE launch
Data speeds drag on the carrier's 3G network
Mediocre battery life
Can't edit home screen dock
Subjective design
S Voice not optimised
Disappointed us
And Samsung's S Voice Siri competitor disappointed
4G heavily impacts battery life. No HDMI port
No HDMI port. Photo quality is a small step back from the GS2
Abstract: The HTC One X was the first new-generation Android smartphone to come out this year. It introduced us to a new kind of Android experience – one powered by an ultra-fast quad-core processor. Moreover, it helped HTC become relevant again, after a brief ...
Superfluid performance, Refined user experience, S Voice natural language recognition
Camera photos tend to be a bit overexposed, No premium materials used in its construction
The Samsung Galaxy S III is a spectacular phone. A big part of what makes it spectacular is its incredible specs sheet. Yeah, although its specs can easily be rivaled by strong competitors like the HTC One X, which also has a quad-core processor and t...
Abstract: ATTENTION. This article is not a detailed review, but a first, albeit a very meticulous look at the phone and its capabilities. We are planning to publish a full review within a week. Sections of he article will expand courtesy of new photos, compar...
Abstract: NEW ORLEANS—Samsung's Galaxy S III has a lot going on. It's not just another big smartphone, although it is, indeed, quite a big smartphone. It's full of new software enhancing the Android 4.0 experience, stuff that it takes a little while to check out.Yo...
Abstract: The successor to the Samsung Galaxy S2, the new handset sports a massive 4.8-inch screen, a quad-core processor and a wide range of other interesting features on board. As the new top-tier Android phone on the block, the S3 is set to go head to head with...
Again, thank you to those of you who viewed the live blog, and also thank you for bringing Android Authority its most number of of readers yet. Everything we do here is for you, our readers. I've just gotten home from the event, and it's 01:26 now. To...
It could be said that Samsung has just presented a smartphone that offers the best of what the competition is offering and a tad bit more. It will surely secure many purchasers, and guarantee even greater success than recorded by its two Galaxy S predeces...
Abstract: And we’re across the finish line. The two Galaxies performed very well for their relatively low standing in the Android world. The only feature that was consistently a problem is the screen – WQVGA is just not enough for a 3.2” screen. Other than that...
The Samsung Galaxy S3 isn't a bad phoner to have in your pocket, and it still feels nicer to use than most budget handsets. If you've been running yours for a couple of years may we suggest a software reset and maybe a new battery and rear shell to spruce...
Fantastic performance, Elegant design, Great screen and camera
Plastic casing is lacklustre, Samsung extras like S Voice feel gimmicky
So what's our overall verdict? Well, we don't want to give it back, which is exactly how we felt with the Galaxy S2 . Once again, Samsung has proven itself as the king of Android kingdom and there's no doubt the Galaxy S3 will fly off the shelves, even ...
