au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3

Testseek.com have collected 993 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2012
June 2012
 
(87%)
993 Reviews
Users
(88%)
22 Reviews
87 0 100 993

The editors liked

  • Fast as a bullet
  • Amazing screen resolution and brightness
  • Fantastic camera optics
  • Fast focus
  • Slim and light
  • Great audio quality
  • Smooth navigation throughout the OS
  • Efficient use of power
  • Excellent camera (for a phone)
  • Ergonomic design
  • Huge
  • Bright
  • Clear display
  • Insanely fast Superb screen Quadcore goodness Jelly Bean out of the box
  • The Samsung Galaxy S3 comes fully loaded with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
  • 4G LTE capability
  • A zippy dual-core processor
  • And a strong 8-megapixel camera. S Beam is an excellent software enhancement
  • And the handset's price is right
  • The Samsung Galaxy S III (S3) comes fully loaded with Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich
  • Excellent 4G speeds
  • Slick and fast software
  • Same great display and design
  • Excellent battery life
  • Superb screen
  • Quad core speed
  • Top media management
  • Same great Galaxy S3 design. Great 4.7-inch screen. 4G data speeds
  • Outstanding battery life. Great display. Zippy performance. Great suite of features

The editors didn't like

  • Poor call quality
  • Poor build quality
  • Screen is useless in sunlight
  • Battery charges slowly
  • Home button is awkward to press
  • TouchWiz deviates too far from ICS “Holo Theme”
  • No 4G or DC-HSPA+
  • Bland design
  • Auto-brightness is too jumpy
  • And low
  • What we like
  • Battery life S Voice still useless Subjective design
  • The Galaxy S3's screen is too dim
  • And Samsung's Siri competitor
  • S Voice
  • Disappointed us. You can only roam at 3G speeds outside of U.S. Cellular's home network
  • Disappointed. Until Sprint's LTE launch
  • Data speeds drag on the carrier's 3G network
  • Mediocre battery life
  • Can't edit home screen dock
  • Subjective design
  • S Voice not optimised
  • Disappointed us
  • And Samsung's S Voice Siri competitor disappointed
  • 4G heavily impacts battery life. No HDMI port
  • No HDMI port. Photo quality is a small step back from the GS2

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 100
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-09-04, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Abstract:  When Samsung launched its popular Galaxy S III Android smartphone in Australia back in May, the company said it was "confident" the lack of a 4G model wouldn't hinder sales of the 3G version. A little over three months later, a 4G version of the Galaxy S ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-04, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Abstract:  Samsung has finally lifted the lid on its much anticipated Galaxy S III Android phone. It boasts a 4.8in Super AMOLED HD display and an 8-megapixel camera that captures 1080p HD video, but largely focuses on software innovation in a bid to push ahead of t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-19, Author: Andrei , review by: productfeedback.com.au

  • Abstract:  Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Galaxy S3...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-03-05, Author: Staff , review by: bit.com.au

  • A superb screen, lots of power, innovative software and a reasonable price on contract mean that the Samsung Galaxy S III still retains a high rating. Read the review.PerformanceBattery LifeFeatures & DesignValue for MoneyOverallSpecs$560 AUD(pricing info...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2012-12-20, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Excellent battery life, Superb screen, Quad core speed, Top media management
  • Subjective design, S Voice not optimised
  • If you've come straight here and looked at the score, let us put it into some kind of context for you: we agonised fabout whether this was another five star phone in the same mould as the Samsung Galaxy S2 - but simply put, it doesn't have the same wow f...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-11-26, Author: Renai , review by: delimiter.com.au

  • When we wrote our initial review of the original Samsung Galaxy S III back in August this year (remember, this was before the iPhone 5 launched, but after the HTC One XL had landed), we rated the handset as the best smartphone available in Australia at t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-24, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Insanely fast Superb screen Quadcore goodness Jelly Bean out of the box
  • Battery life S Voice still useless Subjective design
  • The choice between a 3G Samsung Galaxy S3 and a 4G version is actually quite a simple one. It all comes down to how you answer the question, "Do I need speed or staying power from my smartphone?" If having access to information immediately at any cost is...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Ross , review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Excellent 4G speeds, Slick and fast software, Same great display and design
  • Mediocre battery life, Can't edit home screen dock
  • The Samsung Galaxy S III 4G takes all that we loved from the original Galaxy S III and adds 4G network capability. It certainly achieves impressive, super fast data speeds on the Telstra and Optus 4G networks and the latest software is as fast and smooth...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-10, review by: cravingtech.com

  • The Samsung Galaxy S3 is definitely the best Android smartphone at this stage, no questions about that (unless if you prefer a much larger screen size like the Samsung Galaxy Note 2). It’s fast, gives a smooth experience on Android 4.0 ICS, beautiful s...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-08, Author: Luke , review by: gizmodo.com.au

  • This is the Galaxy S III we should have got back in June. I'll admit that Jelly Bean wasn't a thing then, but we shouldn't have had to wait for it as long as we did. Same thing with 4G. Telstra — a major launch partner for the Galaxy S III — had a 4G netw...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 100 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 100   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×