au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Olympus XZ-1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus XZ-1

Testseek.com have collected 107 expert reviews of the Olympus XZ-1 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus XZ-1.
Award: Editor’s Choice February 2011
February 2011
 
(80%)
107 Reviews
Users
(89%)
13 Reviews
80 0 100 107

The editors liked

  • Like
  • Image quality is excellent
  • But only when shooting RAW. Jpegs are degraded by the noise reduction
  • Which cannot be turned off. Even at low ISO speeds fine detail is smudged by the NR system. The aggressive NR is a mystery because this is not an inhe
  • The Olympus XZ-1 is nicely designed with a solid user interface and very good performance for its cohort
  • Image quality
  • Ease of use
  • Features

The editors didn't like

  • Dislike
  • The omission of an optical viewfinder puts it behind the Canon G12 and Nikon P7000
  • But on a par with the Panasonic LX5. The optional EVF is expensive
  • The XZ-1's image quality is good
  • But even shooting raw it's not quite up to the level of its better competitors
  • Slight lens distortion
  • Could use some control tweaks

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-08-08, Author: Lori , review by: cnet.com.au

  • The Olympus XZ-1 is nicely designed with a solid user interface and very good performance for its cohort
  • The XZ-1's image quality is good, but even shooting raw it's not quite up to the level of its better competitors
  • Enjoyable to shoot and relatively fast, the Olympus XZ-1 only stumbles when it comes to photo quality, which is very good, but not uniformly excellent as one would expect from this class of camera....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-12, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Image quality, Ease of use, Features
  • Slight lens distortion, Could use some control tweaks
  • If you want to have fun while taking photos, then the Olympus XZ-1 is for you. It's easy to use, takes clear and rich images, and it even has useful art filters. We really like it and think it's great for novices photographers as well as pros...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-31, Author: terry , review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • Like: Image quality is excellent, but only when shooting RAW. Jpegs are degraded by the noise reduction, which cannot be turned off. Even at low ISO speeds fine detail is smudged by the NR system. The aggressive NR is a mystery because this is not an inhe
  • Dislike: The omission of an optical viewfinder puts it behind the Canon G12 and Nikon P7000, but on a par with the Panasonic LX5. The optional EVF is expensive

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-01, review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  The non-interchangeable lens in the new camera is the first Olympus compact digital camera lens to feature the company's Zuiko brand, indicating superior imaging performance. Covering focal lengths from 6mm to 24mm (28-112mm in 35mm film format), it has m...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-09, Author: Lori , review by: cnet.com

  • The Olympus XZ-1 is nicely designed with a solid user interface and very good performance for its cohort
  • The XZ-1's image quality is good, but even shooting raw it's not quite up to the level of its better competitors
  • Enjoyable to shoot and relatively fast, the Olympus XZ-1 only stumbles when it comes to photo quality, which is very good, but not uniformly excellent as one would expect from this class of camera.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(78%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-09, review by: photographybay.com

  • Overall, the Olympus XZ-1 is a great little compact camera. I find it to be right up there with the Canon G12 as a serious compact shooter.The design is solid, with a slick metal body, the smart lens selection wheel and the signature Olympus Art Filte...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-07-14, Author: Elias , review by: techworld.com

  • All things considered, we really like the Olympus XZ-1. It's easy to use, yet it has good manual features. But most importantly, it's a fun camera to use and it has interesting art filters to play with. We also like the screen and the fact that it mos...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-05-01, review by: luminous-landscape.com

  • Abstract:  When it comes to usability, its a real horse race. If you already own one of the competitive cameras mentioned I don't think that a move to the XZ-1 would gain you much. But if you're in the market for a pocket camera capable of producing decent image quality then you owe it to yourself to visit a deal..

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-04-25, review by: macworld.com

  • Unique scene modes and art filters, F1.8 aperture at wide-angle end; F2.5 at telephoto, Control ring provides quick manual adjustments,
  • Lacks a hand grip, Underexposed images in iAuto mode, Autofocus struggles in low-light and macro modes, A lot of menu-diving required

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-25, review by: techreviewsource.com

  • Easy to use menu system, Manual & automatic modes, Unique control ring, RAW shooting
  • No hand grip, Subpar video quality, Some images are underexposed, Unfriendly manual focus controls

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 1 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×