Testseek.com have collected 113 expert reviews of the Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch BX200 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Crucial / Micron 2.5 inch BX200 Series SATA600.
(71%)
113 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Outstanding price/performance, Incredible price per GB, 3 year warranty, 7 mm thin—ultrabook compatible
Lower performance than BX100 and similar MLC SSDs
The Crucial BX200 480 GB is currently available online for $130. Outstanding price/performance Incredible price per GB 3 year warranty 7 mm thin—ultrabook compatible Lower performance than BX100 and similar MLC SSDs 8.9 Crucial's new BX200 SSD introduces...
Published: 2016-01-18, Author: Victor , review by: Bjorn3d.com
1TB of storage, Good GB per price ratio, Includes backup software, Good read speed, Good performance with incompressible data, 1TB of storage, Good GB per price ratio, Includes backup software, Good read speed, Good performance with incompressible data
Write speed is quite weak, Does not scale well with high queue depth, Write speed is quite weak, Does not scale well with high queue depth
The BX200 performs decent with in both random and sequential read but it suffered quite a lot in the random write and sequential write. The sequential write shows the worst performance which is somewhat unusual since SSD manufacturers often use this numbe...
Published: 2016-01-01, Author: Ryan , review by: Bjorn3d.com
Read speeds are very respectable, 72TB TDW endurance (40Gb/day over 5 years), Acronis True Image HD license included
Poor write performance once cache is full, Pricing not yet competitive enough to justify purchasing over other drives
So what do the results of all of our testing really mean? Well, it means a few things really. First off is that we definitely do not recommended this drive for users looking for the fastest SSD out there. That is a given. Second, this drive is also no...
There is only one thing that the Crucial BX200 is a lacking, and this is write performance. I am not talking about the synthetic benchmarks but the real world tests, and I was surprised by how easy it was for me to push the drive to its limits. I hope tha
Published: 2015-12-09, Author: Tony , review by: Techreport.com
We did set this up as a head-to-head matchup, so we're going to have to declare a winner. Though neither drive blew us away, the victory goes to the OCZ Trion 100. Both drives struggled to match the speeds of much older hardware (like Intel's X25-M) in s...
Available in 240GB, 480GB and 960GB capacities, Good sequential and random read and write performance, Performs equally well with compressible and incompressible data, SATA 6Gb/s interface, Supports TRIM, SMART and active garbage collection, DEVSLP power
Mediocre random write performance, Write speed drops when SLC cache is full, Does not support hardware based encryption
While not Crucial's fastest or most feature packed SSD, the BX200 is an easy and affordable way for consumers to improve the performance of their existing desktop or notebook computer. The BX200 combines Silicon Motion's SM2256 controller with Micron's ne...
It's not often we get a product that can be summarised so concisely as the Crucial BX200 960GB SSD.More often than not we're balancing price, performance and comparable products. Equally a lot of things, especially motherboards but other techs can have it...
Great software package, Good sequential read/write performance
Can't handle large data transfers well, Mixed performance overall, Not competitively priced, given performance
The BX200 is a passable upgrade over a spinning-platter hard drive, but it offers little to recommend it over its competitors, or its BX100 predecessor. Until the price falls, plenty of better (and better-performing) options are available. Read More…...
By introducing a TLC-based SSD, Crucial is offering exactly what it says: an affordable, entry-level SSD aimed at replacing your HDD. This means that do not expect an overall great performer.According to our tests, the BX200 960GB SSD faced some performan...
