au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Sharp LC-46LE700E



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Sharp LC-46LE700E

Testseek.com have collected 43 expert reviews of the Sharp LC-46LE700E and the average rating is 75%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sharp LC-46LE700E.
 
(75%)
43 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
75 0 100 43

The editors liked

  • Excellent contrast
  • Razor sharp images
  • Seven-star energy rating
  • LED backlighting
  • Deep black levels
  • Detailed pictures
  • Bargain price
  • Great sound

The editors didn't like

  • A bit bulky for an LED TV
  • Stand is fixed
  • Occasional ghosting
  • Some backlight clouding

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-10-16, Author: David , review by: cnet.com

  • Inexpensive for an LCD with LED backlighting; extremely energy efficient; effective video processing that can separate antiblur and dejudder functions; intriguing selection of interactive widgets; superb built-in support including live help with remote...
  • Black levels not as deep as LED and some non-LED-based LCDs; less-accurate grayscale; glossy screen reflects ambient light; minor backlight uniformity issues.
  • The Sharp LC-LE700UN's LED backlighting doesn't elevate its picture quality beyond the LCD norm, but does help make it the most efficient TV we've ever tested. Read full review See all prices

Read the full review (LC-46LE700UN) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(69%)
 
  Published: 2009-10-01, review by: hdtvsolutions.com

  • The Sharp AQUOS LC-40E700UN heralds a new era of LED backlit LCDs that produce a big bright image while being lightweight and eco-friendly....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-27, review by: whathifi.com

  • A mighty 52 inches of screen, decent motion and solid blacks, good Blu-ray pictures
  • No HD tuner or streaming functions, low on style, standard-def content looks rough round the edges

Read the full review (LC-52LE700) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2010-06-05, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • The 700E offers a lot of screen for the money and its performance with HD sources is impressive, thanks to its ability to produce natural colours and inky black levels. However, it has a bad habit of highlighting the negative aspects of standard defin...

Read the full review (LC-52LE700E) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-04-23, review by: avreview.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Lesser issues find a few quite overt backlight inconsistencies creeping in when you view the screen from an angle, and a fairly feeble sound performance. These, though, are insignificant flaws compared wi..

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-03-02, review by: hdtvorg.co.uk

  • The LC-40LE700 is a bit of a conundrum, excellent in some respects and rather mediocre in others. Worthy of serious consideration for any form of content that doesn't contain a great deal of fast on screen action; we would advise against this screen i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-03-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Despite its boxy appearance, the LE700 has great contrast, low power consumption and a superb EPG. ...

Read the full review (LC-40LE700E) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-17, review by: hdtvtest.co.uk

  • Sharp has produced a clear winner without a doubt. Compared to previous models, the level of advancements/ improvements is quite significant. With competitive pricing, Sharp shouldn’t have any problem selling the Sharp LC46LE700E.Calibrated Settings...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2009-11-10, Author: John , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  A little under a month ago I looked at and NEARLY loved the 40LE600E - the first of Sharp's new breed of budget LCD TVs with direct LED backlighting. In fact, the only big problem I had with it was its tendency to suffer with motion blur. So I'm understan...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-05, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Very low energy consumption, Good contrast
  • No rotating stand, Ghosting far too visible, Image quality drops off at viewing angles above 3540°, On screen menus showing their age

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 2 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×