Testseek.com have collected 192 expert reviews of the Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series.
January 2018
(88%)
192 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(89%)
685 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
880100192
The editors liked
Fast sustained read/write performance
Quiet Operation
Durable Design
Competitive Price
High capacity Great speeds Excels in RAID arrays NASspecific features
Low cost per GB
Huge capacity
Standard 3.5-inch drive
Good warranty
Good NAS optimisations
The editors didn't like
Expensive Wasted as a standard hard drive Lower capacities are slower
Published: 2016-08-30, Author: Simon , review by: kitguru.net
Huge capacity, Antivibration technologies, by SSD standards, its cheap
by mechanical standards, its expensive.
The demise of the mechanical hard drive has been predicted for years now, and many hardcore enthusiasts will tell you they just use solid state drives in their system – for the operating system certainly, but even now for file storage. Unfortunately, unle...
Great performance, Silent operation, Low power consumption, Suited for up to 8-bays, 10TB Capacity,
none, “Seagate once again shows us that they’re one of the biggest players in the HDD market with the IronWolf drive. An industry-leading performance and capacity at a low power consumption are things that you simply can’t argue against.”, Seagate IronWol
Seagate really stepped up with their latest drives and now offer the widest availability and choices when it comes to consumer 10TB drives. The IronWolf 10TB drive that I tested today did really great and showed that this is a great drive, not only in siz...
Great performance, Silent operation, Low power consumption, Suited for up to 8-bays, 8TB Capacity,
none, “The Seagate NAS HDD 8TB is without a doubt the best storage drive that we have tested to date. It has a solid performance while staying inaudible even during operation.”, Seagate NAS 8TB (ST8000VN0002) Hard Disk Drive Review, Thank You, Seagate, f
Seagate created another magnificent drive and the NAS HDD with 8TB capacity impressed us in all the benchmarks and taking the lead in almost all of them. It does cost a little bit more than competing 6TB drives, but considering the extra 2TB capacity in t...
Options are always a good thing and that is exactly what the NAS HDD offers us. There are certainly environments where the Enterprise features and extended warranty will be useful but for most consumers the NAS HDD will be more than enough. 3-years is the...
Was this review helpful?
(100%)
Published: 2018-03-06, Author: Jon , review by: pcworld.co.nz
Abstract: There's something about 12TB hard drives reading and writing at 250MBps that we just can't get enough of. This go-round, we review Seagate's IronWolf--the slightly slower, slightly lower-rent cousin to the mighty 12GB Seagate BarraCuda Pro we recently too...
Published: 2018-01-26, Author: Jonathan , review by: aphnetworks.com
Compared to theSeagate IronWolf Pro ST12000NE0007 12TB, the IronWolf ST12000VN0007 12TB we are reviewing today gives up a few things: Three-year warranty rather than five, no included recovery services, 180TB/year workload limit rating rather than 300TB/y...
Published: 2016-12-02, Author: Jonathan , review by: aphnetworks.com
10TB of storage capacity is indeed epic. As we move into a new generation of ultra-large hard drives that takes capacity up another magnitude, I think the Seagate IronWolf ST10000VN0004 is a winner in more than one way. You might think spinning those seve...
Published: 2016-06-17, Author: Jonathan , review by: aphnetworks.com
For about $370 at press time, the Seagate NAS HDD ST8000VN0002 8TB has a lot of similarities with its enterprise grade cousin, theST8000NM0055 8TB. At the same time, there is quite a bit that separates one from the other. Both hard drives are some of the...
Faster performance than lower capacity HDDs, More affordable price-per-capacity compared to lower capacity HDDs
Still quite expensive
9/10Write a ReviewCompare This | SpecificationsThe GoodFaster performance than lower capacity HDDsMore affordable price-per-capacity compared to lower capacity HDDsThe BadStill quite expensiveHave feedback on the article for the editorial team? You can re...
