au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Samyang 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samyang 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC

Testseek.com have collected 11 expert reviews of the Samyang 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC and the average rating is 61%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samyang 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC.
 
(61%)
11 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
61 0 100 11

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2020-02-13, review by: The-digital-picture.com

  • Abstract:  Where you buy your gear matters. You expect to get what you ordered and you want to pay a low price for it. The retailers I recommend below are the ones I trust for my purchases. Get your Rokinon (Samyang) 50mm f/1.4 AS UMC Lens now from:Please share this...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-04-03, review by: pentaxforums.com

  • The comparison between our three tested lenses shows just how far optical design has come in recent years. All three lenses are mostly excellent. The DA* 55mm is hindered by its poorer optical performances in the corners, and by its APS-C pedigree, which...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-12-03, review by: lenstip.com

  • very good image quality in the frame centre, sensibly corrected chromatic aberration, slight coma in the corners of the APSC/DX, low astigmatism
  • image quality near the maximum relative aperture could have been better, too high distortion, unacceptable performance against bright light, noticeable vignetting.
  • Although the comparison between the number of pros and cons of the tested lens seems to be hardly favourable you still cannot call it a botched device, quite the opposite. Even though it costs only a bit more than brand name models with autofocus, in many...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-12-12, Author: CHIP , review by: Chip.de

  • Gute Auflösung im Zentrum
  • Starke Verzeichnung, Schwache Auflösung in den Ecken
  • Nach unseren Labortests erhält das Objektiv Samyang 50 mm F1.4 AS UMC eine insgesamt befriedigende Bewertung. In keiner Testkategorie, aus denen sich die Gesamtwertung errechnet, kann das Gerät vollends überzeugen. So mangelt es ihm an hervorstechenden St...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(61%)
 
  Published: 2016-12-12, Author: CHIP , review by: Chip.de

  • Gute Auflösung im Zentrum, Gute Lichtempfindlichkeit
  • Extrem starke Verzeichung, Auflösungsabfall in den Ecken
  • Mit einer Gesamtwertung von 69 liegt das Objektiv Samyang 50 mm F1.4 AS UMC auf einem befriedigenden Niveau. Im Labor kann der Testkandidat besonders in der Wertungskategorie Auflösung überzeugen - hier liegen die besonderen Stärken des Produkts. Eine Sch...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-08-08, Author: Arthur , review by: focus-numerique.fr

  • Très grande ouverture f/1,4, Une première avec un autofocus pour Samyang, Qualité optique générale, Faible vignetage, Pas de distorsions
  • Manque d'homogénéité du piqué entre le centre et les bords des images aux plus grandes ouvertures, Piqué en retrait aux plus grandes ouvertures, Pas de construction tout temps, Bague de mise au point trop souple, Pas de bague de diaphragme manuelle, Autof
  • Au final, ce 50 mm reçoit tout juste notre recommandation, mais nous attendons Samyang au tournant sur les futures versions avec autofocus: nous serons moins indulgents...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-06-07, Author: Виктор , review by: ferra.ru

  • Abstract:  Вокруг Canon в мае ходило немало слухов. Во-первых все давно ждут EOS 5D Mark IV и жадно глотают мельчайшие полуофициальные подробности. А во-вторых никому не дает покоя 120-мегапиксельный CMOS-сенсор который компания недавно представила. Говорят что...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-12-01, Author: Arkadiusz , review by: optyczne.pl

  • bardzo dobra jakość obrazu w centrum kadru, rozsądnie korygowana aberracja chromatyczna, niewielka koma w rogach matrycy APSC/DX, mały astygmatyzm.
  • jakość obrazu w okolicach maksymalnego otworu względnego mogłaby być lepsza, zbyt duża dystorsja, niezadowalająca praca pod ostre światło, wyraźne winietowanie.
  • Chociaż porównanie liczby zalet i wad nie wypada dla testowanego obiektywu wyjątkowo korzystnie, na pewno nie jest to instrument nieudany. Wręcz przeciwnie. Kosztując niewiele więcej niż wyposażone w autofokus modele producentów firmowych, potrafi w wielu...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-04-06, review by: popco.net

  • Abstract:  최고라는 타이틀은 언제나 가슴을 설레게 한다. 최고의 장비와 자신이 만나 빚어내는 시너지 효과가 최고의 장면으로 기록되는 짜릿한 상상을 사진가라면 누구나 해보았을 것이다. 이러한 사진가들의 열망에 부응하듯 국내 최고의 광학...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-01-24, Author: Bengt , review by: kamerabild.se

  • Ska man utse någon vinnare i det här testet så är det ofrånkomligen Sigman, i alla fall till om man ser till prestanda och upplevd kvalitet. Det är ju också tur eftersom Sigman kan användas på flera olika kameramärken. Är man däremot ute efter något litet...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×