au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2

Testseek.com have collected 637 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9100 Galaxy S2.
Award: Highest Rated April 2011
April 2011
 
(88%)
637 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 637

The editors liked

  • Insanely good 4.3″ Super AMOLED + display
  • Snappy 1.2GHz dual-core CPU
  • Incredibly thin at 8.49mm
  • Ability to shoot semi-legible 1080p video
  • Quadband HSPA+ (21Mbit/7.56Mbit) – Works on every Australian network
  • Fast 4G speeds
  • 4.5in display
  • Slick performance
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II supports T-Mobile's faster HSPA+ network and has a dual-core 1.5GHz processor and an NFC chip. The Android Gingerbread smartphone also has a spacious and vibrant Super AMOLED Plus touch screen
  • 16GB of internal memory
  • And great ca
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II has a speedy dual-core processor
  • A large
  • Gorgeous display
  • 4G capability
  • And excellent cameras. It's also up-to-date with Android 2.3 Gingerbread
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket has a beautiful 4.5-inch Super AMOLED Plus display along with a dual-core 1.5GHz processor
  • An NFC chip
  • And support for AT&T's LTE network. It ships with Android 2.3 Gingerbread
  • And has an 8-megapixel camera with 1080p
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II 4G sports a large and vivid 4.5-inch Super AMOLED Plus display. Powered by a dual-core 1.2GHz processor
  • The phone also runs Android 4.0 and is 4G-capable. Camera quality is also excellent
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II has a large
  • Beautiful 4.5-inch Super AMOLED Plus screen
  • A 1.2GHz dual-core processor
  • A great 8-megapixel camera and 2-megapixel front-facing camera
  • And 16GB built-in storage
  • Incredibly fast
  • Dazzling 4.3 inch screen
  • Excellent video playback
  • Web browser supports Flash
  • Light for its size
  • Superfast reaction times
  • Slim design
  • Ridiculously clear screen
  • Clear call quality
  • 1080p video recording
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II boasts a beautiful display and a thin design. With a dual-core processor
  • The Gingerbread device delivers fast performance
  • As well as good battery life. Camera quality is excellent
  • Excellent performance and brilliant display
  • Ultra-thin and light design
  • Great multimedia features
  • Great performance. Solid battery life. Great 4G speeds
  • When in coverage. Good 8-megapixel camera
  • Lightning fast performance
  • Super AMOLED Plus is fantastic
  • Camera is amongst the best we've seen
  • TouchWiz 4.0 has some neat shortcuts
  • Lightning-fast performance. Super AMOLED Plus is fantastic. Camera is amongst the best we've seen. TouchWiz 4.0 has some neat shortcuts
  • Samsung's overlay to Android has some very interesting features this time around
  • Latest version of Android (Android 2.3 Gingerbread)
  • One of the thinnest and lightest phones we've ever felt

The editors didn't like

  • Kies syncing software for your PC
  • Fairly average loudspeaker
  • TouchWiz
  • Even though it does the job
  • Is too iPhone-ish
  • No notification LED! 1! *angry face*
  • No native micro-HDMI connection
  • Limited 4G coverage
  • Screen resolution outdated
  • Thicker
  • Heavier than 3G model
  • The smartphone is high-priced and on the larger side
  • And you can't remove bloatware
  • The Samsung Galaxy S II lacks a hardware camera button
  • And you need to remove to battery to access the microSD card slot. Call quality could be better
  • AT&T's LTE network is only available in a few cities at the time of the Skyrocket's launch
  • It has a somewhat cheap
  • Plastic feel
  • Call quality could be better. The device is large and has a plasticky build
  • U.S. Cellular's Samsung Galaxy S II has a slower network. It's significantly pricier than other handsets in the carrier's lineup
  • Too large for some
  • Plastic build doesn't feel premium
  • Poor call quality
  • Flimsy back cover
  • Poor keyboard layout
  • Samsung Apps portal
  • Some parts of the phone feel flimsy
  • Text hard to read when zoomed out in browser
  • Plastic battery cover and no camera button
  • Volume on earpiece could be louder
  • Slightly thicker and heavier than the Galaxy S II. Larger screen needs a higher resolution. Older version of Android
  • Battery life is disappointing
  • Videoout requires a separate adapter
  • Battery life is disappointing. Video out requires a separate adapter
  • Plastic casing makes it feel a little cheap
  • Software can be buggy

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 51 of 64
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-04-05, review by: hi-tech.mail.ru/

  • Abstract:  Samsung сейчас является самым крупным производителем Android-смартфонов, а модель Galaxy S стала абсолютным бестселлером в своем классе. Неудивительно, что долгожданный флагман, продолжение прошлогоднего хита наделало столько шума. У нас появилась возможн...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-21, Author: Технослав , review by: gagadget.com

  • Abstract:  Android-смартфон Samsung Galaxy S II (его номенклатурный индекс GT-I9100, он также известен под кодовым именем Seine) будет одним из наиболее интересных и желанных устройств этого года. Сменяя на своем боевом посту своего предшественника Galaxy S . Правда...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-18, review by: zoom.cnews.ru

  • Samsung Galaxy S II – это в первую очередь имиджевое устройство. Его несомненное достоинство в том, что впечатление «имиджевости» не покидает владельца после первого знакомства. Он умеет все, что только может потребоваться: съемка высококачественного ви...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-10, review by: mobile-review.com

  • Динамик в телефоне громкий, на уровне первого Galaxy S, особых отличий нет. Если вам нравилась по этому параметру первая модель, то подойдет и вторая. Виброзвонок довольно слабый, не всегда его можно почувствовать из одежды.Мне аппарат нравится без всяких...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-03, review by: mobile-review.com

  • Abstract:  Внимание. В отличие от предварительного обзора, здесь вы читаете обзор финального образца, как результат, можете оценить все аспекты телефона без каких-либо скидок. Какие-то части повторяются с первым материалом, какие-то сильно дополнены и расширены. Пер...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-09-12, review by: galaxyclub.nl

  • Kort gezegd: de Samsung Galaxy S2 is haar high-end concurrenten heel wat stappen vooruit – en dan proberen we echt objectief te zijn. Samsung heeft al haar mogelijkheden als dominante mobiele technologie producent ingezet om een telefoon te bouwen die op...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-01, review by: portablegear.nl

  • Abstract:  De Samsung Galaxy S2 (of Galaxy S II) (i9100) is gepresenteerd op het Mobile World Congress 2011 in februari. Deze opvolger van de Samsung Galaxy S (i9000) heeft een 4,3-inch multi-touch display waarvoor de nieuwe super-AMOLED Plus-technologie is gebruikt...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-16, review by: tweakers.net

  • Hardware, Schermkwaliteit, Stabiliteit, Opnamekwaliteit, Bouwkwaliteit, Design, Installatie van custom-roms mogelijk
  • Bloatware niet te verwijderen (standaard)
  • Met de komst van de Samsung Galaxy S2 (GT-i9100) heeft Samsung een toestel op de markt gezet waar je voorlopig weer mee vooruit kan. Het is een strak gelijnd toestel, dat voorzien is van goede hardware die nog over te klokken is voor de toekomst. Prijs...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-05, Author: Arnoud , review by: tweakers.net

  • Abstract:  Waarop let je als je een smartphone koopt? De kans is groot dat het scherm, de accuduur en grafische kracht op je lijstje staan. Tweakers testte de smartphones op deze punten....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-16, review by: computertotaal.nl

  • Abstract:  Een telefooncamera heeft het voordeel dat u 'm altijd bij de hand hebt, maar de resultaten zijn doorgaans minder goed dan van een compactcamera. Toch hebben smartphones steeds betere camera's. Wij beoordeelden tien telefoons op hun fotografische kwaliteit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 51 of 64 « Previous   1 ... 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 64   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×