au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Motorola Xoom 2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Motorola Xoom 2

Testseek.com have collected 130 expert reviews of the Motorola Xoom 2 and the average rating is 73%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Motorola Xoom 2.
Award: Most Awarded April 2012
April 2012
 
(73%)
130 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
73 0 100 130

The editors liked

  • Built from premium materials
  • Splash proof
  • Excellent build quality
  • Motocast software
  • Unique looking design
  • Thin and light
  • Crisp
  • Clear screen
  • Splashproof coating
  • Good battery life
  • Lighter
  • Slimmer than original Xoom
  • Great IPS display
  • Great Motocast software
  • Doubles as universal remote for A/V equipment
  • Slimmer than original Xoom. Great IPS display. Great Motocast software. Doubles as universal remote for A/V equipment

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive price
  • Android 4.0 is an upgrade
  • Outdated Android software
  • Sluggish performance
  • Expensive
  • MotoCast software not quite ready
  • Limited storage
  • Too expensive
  • Some build quality gripes
  • Often sluggish performance
  • Not 4G
  • Often sluggish performance. Not 4G

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 13
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-12-12, Author: Vlad , review by: theverge.com

  • Significantly thinner and lighter than predecessor, IPS display is a strength, Camera produces very respectable stills, MotoCast works as advertised
  • Sluggish performance, No storage expansion options, Priced too close to the iPad 2, Won't fulfill its potential until Android 4 upgrade

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(62%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-12, review by: Theinquirer.net

  • High-end specifications and robust design, Motocast app comes in handy, Adobe Flash support, reasonable price
  • Browsing not as smooth as other Android devices, no confirmed date for ICS update, microSD card support has been removed

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-07, Author: Thomas , review by: recombu.com

  • Some great customisations, Fast, especially web browsing, Splash-resistant, Comfortable when held in portrait
  • Yellow hue across screen, Flap at bottom serves no function, Camera uses stock UI, 1.2GHz dual-core futureproofing is questionable

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-07, review by: mobilechoiceuk.com

  • Cool design, MotoCast is a great music and video service, strong battery life, faster processor...
  • Android interface not as slick as iOS, only minor upgrade on original Xoom, power button hard to findLook and Feel...
  • With Ice Cream Sandwich on board – and it will follow – the Xoom 2 would be a much more attractive proposition ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-05, Author: Mat , review by: engadget.com

  • Lighter and slimmer than its predecessorSplashproof coating(Almost) undiluted Android experienceBuilt-in IR emitter
  • Only 16GB of storage: lacks expansion optionFingerprint-magnet
  • The Motorola Xoom 2 improves on the original in almost every way. However, it's no longer the only Honeycomb tablet out there, and pricing seems far too optimistic....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-03, review by: Theinquirer.net

  • Abstract:  Both have typically smooth performance for tablets with Android 3.2 Honeycomb and decent specifications. They both run on a Texas Instruments 1.2GHz dual-core processor and have 1GB of RAM, which is perfectly adequate for general use. It's a shame th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-16, Author: Cormac , review by: laptops.co.uk

  • Nice Design, Good Screen, Some Nice Software Features
  • Can feel a little Flimsy, A little lag is evident, Not Android ICS 4.0, Some software misses
  • The Xoom 2 is most definitely an improvement on the quite good original model and has a lot to commend it. However, the arrival of the new iPad and quad core tablets take the shine off it a little bit....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2012-03-15, review by: digitalversus.com

  • A generally pleasing screen, even when outdoors, MotoCast good for managing digital content and playing it remotely, Infrared emitter/detector, LED info light
  • No memory upgrades possible, Camera and speaker location, Battery life, Choppy zooming, Universal remote function less intuitive than on the Sony S, No Android 4.0 at the moment
  • The Xoom 2 Media Edition has a lot going for it. It also has its share of failings, such as the sloppy handling issues, the lack of Android 4.0 update (for now, at least), the lack of memory upgrades, low battery life for a mobile device, and the fact ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2012-02-24, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Xoom 2 has an extremely tough fight on its hands to remain relevant in an increasingly crowded market. Motorola has made it thinner, lighter and faster than the original Xoom, but it is running outdated Android software and has sluggish performance...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2012-02-23, review by: itreviews.com

  • Fast processor; solid build; great screen,
  • No memory expansion.
  • The Motorola Xoom 2 is a great tablet. Its slightly quirky design doesn’t hamper its use, and it has plenty of oomph under the bonnet. Without memory expansion, it feels slightly hampered and for that reason, it has lost a mark, in our books. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 3 of 13 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×