Testseek.com have collected 369 expert reviews of the Motorola Moto 360 and the average rating is 72%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Motorola Moto 360.
(72%)
369 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(87%)
111 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
720100369
The editors liked
Beautiful design. It's round. The leather band is nice (though I'd replace it) and the finish is superb
Wireless Qi charging is an absolute must have for a watch that needs charging every couple of days
It needs charging every couple of days
As opposed
Brilliantly designed and people will notice it
Included Qi wireless charging cradle works seamlessly and charges 360 in a jiffy
Great customisation options available
THE
Gorgeous design
Very comfortable to wear
Dust and water resistant also
Great charging dock
The Moto 360's distinctive round design and premium materials look sharp. It's lightweight and comfortable
And it doubles as a bedside clock with its clever included inductive charging cradle
Metal body
Screen is protected by Gorilla Glass
Mostly circular screen makes the 360 look more like a watch than the square smart watches out there
Comfortable to wear
Heart-rate tracker included
Motorola includes some custom software for making watc
Beautiful design
Premium materials
Snappy performance
Runs Android Wear
Compatible with any Android device running 4
3 or higher
Comfortable leather straps
Nice
Customisable watch faces
Improved performance
IPhone compatibility
Beautifully designed
Works on both iOS and Android
Can get you as much as two days battery life
Available in several sizes and finishes
Replaceable bands
Great design
Speedy performance
Customisable straps
The editors didn't like
The supplied light-grey leather band
While it feels nice
Really doesn't look super premium. I think the matte black option is probably a better bet
Once in a blue moon
The screen becomes non-responsive
Making it rather difficult to use the watch
Or
Battery life
Its biggest pitfall
Doesn't offer much in the way of durability and protruding display prone to scratches
Android Wear still hasn't been updated to better accommodate circular displays
Software hiccups here and there
Android Wear still lacking in apps
Poor battery life
Its battery life is not good enough for a watch. Its Android Wear software is awkward and not entirely useful
Its fitness features are lacking
And its round display has a weird black bar at the bottom
A heart rate sensor, NFC for Google Pay, Wi-Fi, and everything else you would expect from a Wear OS watch is here, The 1GB of RAM makes this one of the smoothest Wear OS watches on the market right now
The $350 MSRP is almost laughable when you can buy a Fossil Gen 5 with the same internal hardware for at least $100 less, The recessed dial is harder to use than the dial on most other smartwatches, and there's only one customizable button
Moto 360 (2019)6/10Probably not. The new Moto 360 is a decent product on its own, but it doesn't make much sense to spend $350 on it when you can buy a Fossil Gen 5 for around $250 (it has even dropped as low as $170). Not only does the Fossil Gen 5 have...
One of the reasons that I dug through photos from 2014 to find images of my old Moto 360 is because I wanted to see just how similar these things are, and they're not. Like I said earlier, if you were hoping for the same device but with updated internals...
Reflective display performs great in the sun, Silicone body and strap built for fitness, Integrated GPS for phonefree run tracking
Battery struggles to get through a day, Fitness features underdeveloped, Silicone picks up every piece of lint and hair, Ambient display has no backlighting
Android Wear has always had some pretty basic fitness tracking built in. With a gyroscope in every smartwatch and most Android Wear watches sporting heart rate sensors, they're already capable, if basic, fitness trackers. The addition of GPS and a fitness...
Abstract: While my first inclination was to title this post "what no other smartwatch has", that just wouldn't be accurate. What we've got here is a bona-fide piece of technology in the Moto 360 Sport that's never been released in any device before. Here, according...
Abstract: Smartwatches really only came onto the scene in a major way in the past two years — Google, Apple, and Samsung are all hoping it'll be the next big computing platform. Since then, we've seen lots of manufacturers try different strategies for strapping a c...
Abstract: You know what they say, gang: When it rains, it pours.Just yesterday, I strapped on the new Moto 360 smartwatch, which showed up in the midst of my Moto X Pure Edition review process. And now, what do we have here? Why, it's the other highly anticipated W...
Abstract: It's a tale of two smartwatches. Both round, both running Android Wear. One selling for $349, the other for $180. So which watch is the one for you?We're talking, of course, about the LG Watch Urbane and the Moto 360 -- two of the most buzzed about Androi...
Published: 2015-04-20, Author: Juan , review by: androidguys.com
As I said before, this is by no means supposed to be a detailed review on the Moto 360. Just a short synopsis of my experience with the Moto 360 and some of the changes it has seen since it first came out.While the Moto 360 did not have all of the feature...
Fantastic build quality, Stylish, understated, sleek, Syncs easily with Android, Moto Maker = Customizable, Very useful mobile accessory
Won't work with any other OS other than Android
We're sure many of you are contemplating the need for a smartwatch. I, too, wondered this. I've found myself quite productive using only a smartphone, and I'm a proponent of minimalism. Those who are managing just fine by using just a phone, and aren't ke...
Some might find the "flat tire" a bit weird, but it's not that noticeable. Android Wear needs a bit of work
For a first generation Android Wear device, the Moto 360 performs well and looks decent while on your wrist. As far as the device itself, I couldn't find much wrong with it based on the version of Android Wear it was running. It also functions as intended...
