Testseek.com have collected 318 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 3770K 3.5GHz Socket 1155 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 3770K 3.5GHz Socket 1155.
April 2012
(87%)
318 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(95%)
4688 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
870100318
The editors liked
The top choice for consumer-grade CPUs. QuickSync improvements are tangible
After spending some time with Ivy Bridge we quickly discovered that Intel has raised the bar across the board for performance. Not bad considering that Ivy Bridge does not feature a brand-new microarchitecture and is basically a die shrink of Sandy Br...
Published: 2012-04-23, Author: Adam , review by: pcgamer.com
Abstract: Chin up CPU fans, Intel has launched its latest batch of processors out into the world today. On this fine anniversary of Shakespeare's birthday an infinite number of monkeys has been hard at work producing a replacement for the entire Core i7 and Core i5...
Abstract: Interestingly, Intel's own literature suggests the biggest beneficiaries of its 22nm process node will be server and smartphone processors. What Intel is saying is that its 22nm processors will bring lower power consumption and enable it to finally p...
Was this review helpful?
(70%)
Published: 2012-04-23, Author: Ali , review by: wccftech.com
It was a foregone conclusion that Ivy Bridge would be faster as compared to Sandy Bridge processors. The difference is as was expected, hovering between 10-15% depending on the application being run. The processor over-clocks just as well as previous proc...
Published: 2012-04-23, Author: Matthew , review by: pcmag.com
Good performance for the price. Highly energy efficient. Supports DirectX 11. Backward compatible with previous-generation motherboards.
Offers only minor performance improvements on highest-end last-generation CPU. Graphics still not comparable to what you get with a discrete video card
The new flagship CPU of Intel's mainstream line, the Core i7-3770K blends speed and power usage in one impressive package....
Excellent Power Characteristics, Nicely Overclockable, Strong Performance, Much Better GPU and Quick Sync, Compatible With Existing Socket 1155 coolers
Cheap Discrete GPUs Still Faster, CPU Not Much Faster Than 2700K
As we've mentioned many times in this piece, Ivy Bridge does not feature a brand-new microarchitecture designed to obliterate the previous generation. Rather, Ivy Bridge, and the 3rd Generation Core processor family based on the microarchitecture, is an e...
Significantly enhanced on-chip 3D-graphics performance, Highly overclockable, Compatible with many previous-generation motherboards, Reduced power usage
CPU performance only slightly boosted over previous-generation Core i7 chips
The raw CPU performance is only slightly better than its immediate predecessor's, but the Core i7-3770K is the first Intel processor we've tested with built-in graphics powerful enough to run the latest games, albeit at reduced detail settings. Read More...
Lower power than Sandy Bridge, although this isn't significant for desktop platforms, Faster and cheaper (if not by much) than Sandy Bridge CPUs, Intel HD4000 iGPU significantly faster than HD3000, Can be used in Z68series motherboards (with vendor BIOS support), Still the best performance in a mainstream consumer CPU,
Still only 16 PCIE lanes, Early production stepping doesn't overclock as well as current Sandy Bridge
Ivy Bridge is finally here, and if its performance improvements over Sandy Bridge are underwhelming, remember that Sandy Bridge set a very high bar. Without Sandy Bridge to compare it to, we'd be lauding Ivy Bridge performance and overclocking to the ...
and FVSo we went into this knowing this would just be an improvement on what we had already seen with Sandy Bridge. I was actually surprised at the improvements we saw on the CPU side of things, mostly due to the improvements in Turbo Boost. On the GP...
Intel is in the enviable position of having the enthusiast CPU market all to itself right now. AMD’s competition is increasingly focused on the fusion of GPU and CPU, but this has come at the cost of raw CPU performance. For those who use a dedicated g...
