au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155

Testseek.com have collected 272 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2011
January 2011
 
(87%)
272 Reviews
Users
(97%)
1807 Reviews
87 0 100 272

 

Reviews

page 2 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-12-23, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Benchmarking 86 CPUs takes a while. After long last, though, we have 51 models from AMD and 35 from Intel tested in our current suite. If you want to know how your processor sizes up to its competition, you'll find plenty of comparison data inside! 86 C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-31, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  Today we're going to compare the perfomance of the three Intel Core architechtures—Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, and Ivy Bridge—in as equal conditions as possible. Testbeds For tests, we shall have only Intel Core i7 processors, since the 1st Gen Core i5 had ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-08-23, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  As you may know, a while back, we came to some difficult realizations about the validity of our methods for testing PC gaming performance. In my article Inside the second: A new look at game benchmarking, we explained why the widely used frames-per-second...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-04-23, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • The new Core i7-3770K is a no-brainer if you were considering buying the Core i7-2600K; it costs the same and is faster.It is, however, very important to understand that this processor is targeted to users who will really benefit from additional proces...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-25, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  This time we'd like to offer you the summarized test results of as many as 71 processors. This generally marks the end of the year, not the end of another test method's life cycle (like the last time). We believe this summary contains all important pro...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-01-24, Author: Michael , review by: modsynergy.com

  • For where the Sandy Bridge based Intel Core i7-2600K is marketed towards, the mainstream crowd, the Core i7-2600K is a fantastic package. I think this is due to the competitive price point. It’s value is noticeable as one does not need to break the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2011-11-14, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • While we don't want to give the impression that the i7-3930K is a slow CPU for consumer applications and games, it isn't significantly faster than the Core i7-2600K. This is a problem for Intel, as the i7-3930K is almost exactly double the price; LGA20...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-07, Author: Carl , review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-19, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Abstract:  Today we shall focus on Intel Core i7 processors, in particular those outperforming Core i7-880. Firstly, we need to retest them with our new test method. Secondly, the new LGA2011 platform is to be announced very soon, and we'll need these test result...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  After so much postponing, AMD is finally releasing its new processor series based on the “Bulldozer” architecture, the FX, featuring models with four, six, or eight processing cores. Let’s test the top-of-the-line, the eight-core AMD FX-8150 (3.6 GHz),...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 28 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×