au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775

Testseek.com have collected 84 expert reviews of the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 3.0GHz Socket 775.
Award: Most Awarded January 2008
January 2008
 
(83%)
84 Reviews
Users
(90%)
115 Reviews
83 0 100 84

The editors liked

  • 45-nanometre transistors
  • Overclockable
  • New SSE4 instruction set

The editors didn't like

  • Current motherboards may need a BIOS upgrade before this CPU will work The Final Word As usual theres a hefty price on this right now
  • But the new transistor technology and larger cache seem to have given this CPU a nice boost over its predecessor. I...

 

Reviews

page 2 of 9
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-11-27, review by: ixbtlabs.com

  • Fortunately, they havent made a Prescott out of a Penryn. At the same core clock the new processor performed 8% faster than the old one (on average). Besides, some details indicate that has been achieved not only due to the extensive approach (e.g., ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-23, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650, formerly known as Yorkfield, is the first 45-nm desktop CPU from Intel, being a quad-core CPU running internally at 3 GHz and externally at 1,333 MHz, the same clock specs of Core 2 Extreme QX6850. QX9650, however, brings t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-19, review by: techspot.com

  • The new Penryn architecture has proven to be a worthy successor to the original Conroe as it offers better performance while significantly reducing operating temperatures and power consumption levels. This update is certainly going to help bolster the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-12, review by: digital-daily.com

  • Abstract:  In the expiring year 2007, Intel prepared quite a nice surprise to the users: launched a new series of CPUs manufactured following the 45-nm process technology. Any change of the process technology is just the right time to update the structure of the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-12, review by: guru3d.com

  • So I will not deny or dispute that quad-core processors face the troublesome issue that multi-threading hardly is supported by consumer software. But much like the move from single- to dual cores processors, the move is worth your while in the end as ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-07, review by: Behardware.com

  • Abstract:  November 7, 2007 Since the launch of the Core 2 in the summer of 2006, Intel’s line of processors hasn’t evolved in terms of architecture. In fact, there has just been the release of four core versions composed of two Conroe dies and then slig...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-01, Author: Benny , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Last April, I was in Beijing, attending Intel's first Intel Developer Forum outside of the US. There, CEO Paul Ottelini announced that Intel was on schedule to move from a 0.065 micron process down to a 0.045 micron process. Intel has ramped up its 45 nan...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: fudzilla.com

  • While the bigger cache and SSE4 do not help any application, it is a huge step forward for Intel. Now you can use a quad-core and not have to worry about your electricity bill. If the cores are idle, they stay idle, and consume much less power than any...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: neoseeker.com

  • I think Intel has another smashing winner on its hands. To sum up our findings, lets consider the following few points. The architectural improvements to the Penryn core yielded a significant increase in performance clock for clock against previous C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2007-10-29, review by: madshrimps.be

  • Abstract:  A little over a year ago we saw Intel take back the performance crown when they launched their new CPU based off the Pentium M series, dubbed “Core 2 Duo” this CPU held 2 physical cores inside one heatspreader, and it’s performance was s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 9 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 9   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×