Testseek.com have collected 119 expert reviews of the Intel 2.5 inch 730 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 76%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel 2.5 inch 730 Series SATA600.
March 2014
(76%)
119 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(93%)
1789 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
760100119
The editors liked
The Intel SSD 730 Series has a high endurance rating and comes with a five-year warranty. The drive offers a huge boost in performance compared with regular hard drives and can handle RAID configurations
The editors didn't like
The new drive doesn't support encryption
And its performance isn't the best among similarly priced SSDs
Reviews
page 2 of 12
Order by:
Score
Published: 2014-04-13, Author: Bruno , review by: reviewstudio.net
great performance, excellent power consumption
price
Intel made an excellent SSD, based on its own controller and NAND flash modules. The performance and the power consumption are as claimed, but the price is too high comparing to other drives with the same capabilities.PROsCONs- great performance- excellen...
Was this review helpful?
(83%)
Published: 2014-04-07, Author: Michael , review by: ubergizmo.com
Going through the specifications alone already gave me the assumption that the product focuses around reliability and consistency.Reliability70 GB host write a day.20 mn NAND, Data Center gradePower Loss ProtectionLife expectancy is rated at 2 million com...
We are pleased to welcome the new Intel 730 SSD which features Intel’s third-generation controller and is targeted at enthusiasts. It is an indication of Intel’s intention to stay on the top-end SSD market after its position has been weakened by the m...
The Intel series 730 SSD positions itself in a massively saturated market. Now, all SSDs in this class win and lose a little from each other in respective benchmarks, overall it remains to be a lot of the same. Especially once you house that SSD into you...
When we first heard about Intel combining their Enterprise arm with the desktop brigade we were intrigued, albeit slightly cautious. After all, it's not as if most SSDs are particularly slow or prone to breaking. Then news broke that the controller was a...
Published: 2014-03-04, Author: Kristian , review by: anandtech.com
It's great to see that Intel has not forgotten the enthusiast market. While the SSD 520 and SSD 530 weren't bad SSDs, they didn't exactly fill the shoes of X-25M—they were just another batch of SandForce drives, with more generally better validation. With...
Excellent performance, especially IOPS at low QD, Data Center pedigree and reliability, Data Center grade power loss protection, Good cost/GB (se below),
High power draw and corresponding high temps may be an issue for some
Intel has a track record of overlapping parts among their consumer and enterprise lines. They did it with the X25-E / X25-M, with the SSD 710 / SSD 320, and now they've repeated that trend with the DC S3500 and SSD 730. The big difference this time ar...
We've waded through a lot of performance data, and we'll indulge a couple more graphs before weighing in with our final verdict. The following scatter plots use an overall performance score, which we derived by comparing each drive's performance to a com...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2014-02-27, Author: Christopher , review by: tomshardware.com
Word on the streets is that no self-respecting 11-year-old boy can resist computer hardware with a skull on it. It's probably a shame, then, that there aren't many 11-year-olds in the prosumer category, sporting wallets fat enough to drop twice as much mo...
