au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Canon EOS 5D Mark 3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 5D Mark 3

Testseek.com have collected 212 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 5D Mark 3 and the average rating is 90%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 5D Mark 3.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2012
April 2012
 
(90%)
212 Reviews
Users
(96%)
759 Reviews
90 0 100 212

The editors liked

  • What is there not to like about a responsive camera that produces technically stunning images (in RAW) time after time? The faster burst rate and the wider bracketing options are welcome. To be able to capture clean images at outrageously high ISO speeds
  • Excellent HDR mode
  • Detailed raw and JPG files
  • High quality images
  • Low noise
  • Improved AF performance. Excellent image quality. Headphone monitoring. Improved video quality with low moire and artefacts. Excellent high ISO performance

The editors didn't like

  • The JPEG noise reduction is ridiculously aggressive for a camera of this standard
  • Complicated AF system
  • A bit pricey
  • Repositioned buttons may annoy Mark II upgraders. No clean HDMI output. Video and images straight from camera can benefit from a small amount of sharpening

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 22
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-09-01, review by: Kickstartnews.com

  • Abstract:  There is nothing in photography and serious video that the Canon 5D Mark III can't handle. I have personally never liked the physical form factor of the full-size Canon camera bodies, but the 5D Mark III has slight shutter button angle, control button...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2012-08-08, review by: videomaker.com

  • Manual audio gain control, Headphone jack, Superb lowlight performance, 30minute maximum record time, Improved rolling shutter
  • No uncompressed video out, Sluggish autofocus in liveview mode
  • Superb imaging and fleshed out audio control makes the 5D Mark III a worthy successor to the camera that forever changed the landscape of video production.Canon Inc. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-28, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Let's compare the sharpness of Canon's two top cameras of 2012: the 22MP versus the 18 MP . These are crops taken from the center of these images, each shot with the at ISO 100 and f/5.6. On most computer......

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-26, Author: Mike , review by: technobuffalo.com

  • Abstract:  The Canon EOS 5D Mark III is the worthy replacement of the Canon EOS 5D Mark II, the full-frame DSLR that changed everything. The 5D Mark II was a phenomenal success when it was released back in 2008 and the camera is still one of the top contenders to th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-07-11, Author: Philip , review by: popphoto.com

  • Abstract:  The 5D we've been waiting for, since, well, the EOS 5D Mark II came outWhat's Hot: Excellent image quality to ISO 12,800. What's Not: No pop-up flash. Who it's For: Pro and advanced amateur shooters looking for an affordable full-framer.How does the Canon...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-06-27, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Canon Beats Nikon This Year...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-06-14, review by: g4tv.com

  • Abstract:  Video Review: The Canon 5D Mark III is both a professional still camera and video camera with 22 megapixels, a "full frame" sensor and can shoot cinema quality 1080p video at 24 fps. Chris Hardwick and Matt Mira review the $3,500 DSLR for Gadget Pr0n....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2012-06-13, Author: Theano , review by: digitalcamerareview.com

  • Excellent photo/video quality, Excellent build quality, Advanced 61 point AF system
  • Best image quality from Raw (vs. JPEG), Overly aggressive noise reduction, Monaural onboard microphone
  • On paper, the Canon 5D Mark III may not seem like a huge step up from the 5D Mark II especially given all the rumors (and long-time anticipation) surrounding its release. In some ways, the Mark III on the surface doesn't dazzle with additional bells and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-06-08, review by: The-digital-picture.com

  • Abstract:  A full Canon EOS Rebel T4i / 650D review is planned. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-06-05, Author: Dan , review by: pdnonline.com

  • Improved overall image quality, better HD video quality and more robust feature set, more comfortable and durable, weatherresistant camera build, faster 6 fps burst speed, vastly improved autofocus system
  • Only slightly more resolution than fouryearold previous model, starting price nearly $1,000 higher than predecessor, builtin mic only offers mono sound, Price: $3,499, www.usa.canon.com
  • Canon fans looking for “the next big thing” with the 22.3-megapixel 5D Mark III might have been disappointed after seeing its feature set which, on face value, seems only a modest improvement over the groundbreaking 5D Mark II from 2008. Meanwhile, photog...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 22 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×