au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526

Testseek.com have collected 120 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526 and the average rating is 73%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526.
 
(73%)
120 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
73 0 100 120

The editors liked

  • Responsive and clear multitouch screen
  • Compact
  • FM radio
  • Ease of use
  • Tiny
  • Touch-screen
  • Easy to use
  • Has a dock connector
  • New watch faces are nice
  • Built-in fitness features work well
  • It's still a great portable music player
  • Great size
  • Very light
  • Superb design
  • Volume increments have been refined to give you more control

The editors didn't like

  • No camera
  • No video recorder
  • Lacks alarm clock and calendar
  • Can't manually turn it off
  • No in-line headphone controls
  • Clip is awkward
  • No video
  • No apps
  • $199 (8GB)
  • $229 (16GB)
  • Upgrades from last model are minor at best
  • Accessibility functions need more work
  • Battery may run out faster than expected

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-09-07, Author: Vincent , review by: slashgear.com

  • Abstract:  Apple may not have invented the MP3 player, but with its iPod range it certainly defined it. Every year consumers and rivals alike wait for the company’s September music event, to see what the must-have functionality and hardware is this season. SlashG...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-06, review by: Laptopmag.com

  • Responsive multitouch display, Intuitive interface, including a shake-to-shuffle feature, Supports Nike + iPod Sports Kit, FM Radio, Sturdy clip for attaching to clothes &amp, bags, Long battery life
  • No video playback or recording, Small volume buttons, Headphone cord could be shorter, As a clip-on MP3 player, it's boxier than the iPod shuffle
  • Apple's in-between-size iPod gets a makeover with an ultracompact design, intuitive multitouch display, and sporty clip.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-02, Author: Jesus , review by: gizmodo.com

  • Abstract:  Apple's iPod nano 2010 is a good MP3 player. It's tiny, the battery seems to last forever, and it has a great user interface.AdvertisementThis is the best pure music player out there right now, thanks to the combination of its physical specs and user inte...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-01, review by: avrev.com

  • The new iPod Nano is a solid choice for anyone that’s looking for a step up from the Shuffle, but not quite to the feature heavy, more expensive iPod Touch. The menu interface is more streamlined than the previous model and it’s definitely a better p...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: about.com

  • Abstract:  The GoodSmaller, lighter enclosurePedometer/fitness tracking app The BadTouchscreen is a usability nightmareSlightly too heavy to clip to sleeveVideo camera and playback removed The Price8GB – US$14916Gb - $179 The tiny size and weight of the 6th gener...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, review by: macintouch.com

  • Abstract:  Disclaimer: This review reflects the personal opinions of Robert Mohns, a freelance reviewer, who has no financial interest in the product. Our reader report discussions offer additional, unbiased discussion (both pro and con), where more feedback ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-05-26, Author: Lou , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Long ago, Apple fans wore their iPod nanos on their wrists, as a sort of prehistoric Apple Watch. But how well would this setup compare to the real thing? You might surprised. Here's our head-to-head comparison of the Apple Watch and the iPod nano 6Gk, co...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-07-05, Author: Amar , review by: laptops.co.uk

  • A 24hour battery life, FM Radio, New multitouch technology, A 1.5inch display screen
  • It is extremely easy to lose and due to its weight and size it is difficult to realise exactly where you have left it
  • A small, nifty, light and reasonably priced iPod Nano and is a great addition to the Apple range. Another benefit is with the release of the new iPod Nano older generations will drop in price and even though they won’t feature the latest technology they w...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-02, review by: whathifi.com

  • Feels good, that slick Apple interface, neat features, the sound is superb
  • Despite that price drop, it's still relatively expensive

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-21, Author: David , review by: macworld.co.uk

  • Price cut; integrated pedometer support; highly portable
  • No video capabilities
  • It's worth repeating that this update only affects the software; 2010/2011 nanos can get all of these feature for free by updating in iTunes. But if you don't own a sixth-gen nano, this is well worth the money. The 2010 model was already a big step forwar...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
    page 4 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×