au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 347 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 1700 3.0GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2017
March 2017
 
(84%)
347 Reviews
Users
(98%)
17 Reviews
84 0 100 347

The editors liked

  • Solid 8 Core/16 Thread performance
  • Lower TDP of 65W for cooler operation
  • Our Sample overclocked to 3.9GHz easily
  • Suitable for content creation / video editing or render work
  • New AM4 platform
  • Very compelling price
  • Great CPU for a multi-purpose system

The editors didn't like

  • Still slightly slower in some single threaded applications

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 8 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-04-18, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Eight cores, Faster than the the Ryzen 7 1800X when overclocked
  • Low stock speed, Not as fast in lightly threaded tasks as Intel chips
  • Unbeatable value for multi-threaded workloads, especially when it’s overclocked...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-12-05, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • There's a range of advice we can offer to any prospective Ryzen owners. First, the more expensive 1800X is only recommended if you want the fastest possible stock processor, no matter what the cost. Highly clocked out of the box, there's not a huge amount...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-12-04, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  For the past few years, processors made by Intel have been more powerful – and much more popular – than those made by rival AMD. However, AMD’s Ryzen processors have turned that around: they’re powerful CPUs at a tempting price, and an excellent alternati...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-29, Author: Gavin , review by: play3r.net

  • Abstract:  AMD hadn't just announced a new processor architecture, but the dawning of a new manufacturing process in which the chips would be based on, 14nm which was a first for AMD. Not only was their new 14nm FinFET process to be more energy efficient, but would...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-06, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Unlocked ratio multiplier, Lowcost eight core, 65W TDP, Bundled cooler
  • Lower stock performance than other Ryzen 7 models, Lower game performance than Intel processors, Poorly optimized software ecosystem
  • The 1700 performs well in heavily threaded workloads, but lags behind Intel's quad cores in most gaming scenarios. However, the Ryzen 7 1700 also offers the lowest entry-level price point for a modern eight-core processor and features enough overclock...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-04-03, Author: Dave , review by: pcgamesn.com

  • The Ryzen 7 1700 is really what I was hoping for from the first octa-core Zen-based chips. It's around the same price as Intel's eight-threaded quad-core i7 7700K, if a little cheaper, and runs rings around it from a straight CPU performance point of view...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-26, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • There's a range of advice we can offer to any prospective Ryzen owners. First, the more expensive 1800X is only recommended if you want the fastest possible stock processor, no matter what the cost. Highly clocked out of the box, there's not a huge amount...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-16, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net

  • Excellent multi-threaded performance that is vastly superior to that of the Core i7-7700K, Competitive performance against Intel processors three times its price, Up to 3.75GHz XFR frequency helps single-threaded performance, Unlocked CPU multiplier and o
  • Gaming performance is not best suited for ultra-high refresh rates and trails i7-7700K levels (outside of GPU-limited scenarios), Lower memory frequency support compared to Kaby Lake
  • AMD's Ryzen 7 1700 is perhaps the most interesting chip in the line-up due to its lower price than the 1700X and 1800X, which were superb value in their own right. A new level of multi-threaded performance has been delivered at a £330 price point where In...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 8 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×