au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 162 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Nano 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Good Buy September 2015
September 2015
 
(82%)
162 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
82 0 100 162

The editors liked

  • Compact size
  • Excellent performance at 2650x1440
  • Operating temperature and power draw suitable for a compact build
  • Audible but not too loud - good for a reference cooler
  • Highend gaming performance
  • Efficient for a Fiji GPU
  • Teeny weeny
  • Ultra small
  • Full-sized performance
  • Quiet cooler

The editors didn't like

  • Not Cheap
  • Superexpensive
  • Size is less of a miniITX issue now
  • 4GB HBM limit
  • Coil whine
  • Very expensive
  • No HDMI 2.0
  • Only 4GB memory

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 17
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-08-27, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com

  • More About HDPLEX H5Subject: Cases and Cooling | September 15, 2015 - 02:57 PM | Scott MichaudTagged: HDPLEX, h5, fanlessFanlessTech has another look at the HDPLEX H5. Their last preview did not have pictures of the case itself, so I needed to use a photo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-08-27, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • Abstract:  When AMD announced its lineup of graphics cards based on the Fiji GPU, the firm said it would eventually be offering two distinctive products in addition to the Radeon R9 Fury and R9 Fury X. One of those cards will be a dual-GPU monster in the vein of the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-02-14, Author: Farzin , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Both Warhammer and Total War are popular game series, however this isn't the only reason as to why the new game Total War: Warhammer is interesting. The game also has a DirectX 12 mode. In this review we test Warhammar with 20 GPUs in DirectX 12: the numb...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-11-02, Author: Rikki , review by: eteknix.com

  • Great performance, Quiet operation at low loads, HBM is innovative, Extremely low power consumption for performance, Compact size is ideal for small form factor,
  • Crossfire R9 Nano’s defeats the ideal of small form factor suitability, Neutral, 4GB HBM is good for now, but very little future-proofing, “The R9 Nano in Crossfire is an amazing achievement for AMD and a great step in the right direction for the future o
  • PriceSince the initial launch of the R9 Fury X, HBMv1 stock levels and prices have plateaued. This has resulted in the R9 Nano being available for as little as £469.99 from OverclockersUK. In the US, the R9 Nano range has slightly dropped in price and can...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-10-05, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk

  • Well worth the Gamer Approved Award.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(92%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-26, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com

  • High, end gaming performance, Efficient for a Fiji GPU, Teeny weeny
  • Super, expensive, Size is less of a mini, ITX issue now, 4GB HBM limit, Coil whine
  • The Radeon R9 Nano matches impressive scale with high-end performance, but the price is prohibitive especially when size is really not so much of an issue anymore...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-21, Author: Mike , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Tiny design – small enough for mini-ITX, Stonking performance at high resolutions, High Bandwidth Memory used
  • Ruinously expensive, High-pitched capacitor whine, A little slower than current flagships
  • AMD's latest card is one of its most outlandish and impressive. It's the first time I've seen true high-end power inside a card that's small enough to comfortably fit inside a mini-ITX chassis – and it achieves this without becoming too hot or loud. It...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-16, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Great performance for its size, Arguably preferable to the Fury X
  • Other cards already accomplish its goal, Expensive, Can't handle 4K in every game
  • The R9 Nano is a novel idea for a card. It's built on the theory that gamers want a card with high performance in a small package. Whether that's true or not remains to be seen, but either way, the R9 Nano is unlikely to satisfy those in the market for...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality. The background 'buzz' on our sample is a concern, but in terms of the overall cooling assembly, it works very well - the Nano...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-09-10, Author: Stuart_Davidson , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • A product which pushes boundaries… sometimes too far. Not cheap but for certain consumers who want to work around its issues this will be a product which brings new performance levels to small form factor systems...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
    page 4 of 17 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 17   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×