au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe

Testseek.com have collected 344 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 Fury X 4GB GDDR5 PCIe.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2015
June 2015
 
(85%)
344 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
85 0 100 344

The editors liked

  • Excellent performance
  • Whisper-quiet cooler
  • Extremely small form factor
  • Geforce GTX 980 Ti-equalling performance
  • Watercooling out of the box
  • Enough power for single-screen 4K

The editors didn't like

  • Not quite as fast as a GTX 980 Ti
  • Only 4GB of memory
  • Poor driver support
  • Expensive (for AMD)
  • Watercooling requires extra space
  • Competition from cheaper cards
  • GTX 980 Ti

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 9 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • AMD's fans wanted to see an ultra-high-end powerhouse capable of creaming GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Its detractors assumed a series of delays meant it'd be too hot and slow. In reality, neither group can claim clairvoyance.Instead, the Radeon R9 Fury X delivers...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Compact, attractive, Stock liquid cooling, Competitive performance-per-watt
  • Liquid cooler's radiator is unwieldy, Doesn't beat the GTX 980 Ti
  • So, here's the moment of truth. Should you buy the Radeon R9 Fury X instead of the GTX 980 Ti? Probably not. The Fury X is an impressive card. Were it alone in its bracket, or priced slightly differently, it'd be easy to recommend. At $649, though, it...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • The implementation of HBM appears to change the way a card scales upwards with resolution increases. Typically, if a card was similar to a GTX 980 at 1080p, it would also be very similar at 4K. What we see here, however, is the Fury X performing close to...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(84%)
 
  Published: 2015-07-10, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • A Twist in this Story? The 15.7 DriversLess than 48 hours before this review was published, AMD told us about their new 15.7 drivers. For those of us who are accustomed to AMD launches the distinct lack of time between their driver announcement, the avail...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • The Fury X has a lot riding on its shoulders. This is AMD’s shot to beat or at the very least catch up to NVIDIA after two years of trailing behind their Kepler and now Maxwell architectures. So did they accomplish these loft goals or did the Fiji archite...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-06-24, Author: Brad , review by: pcworld.in

  • So there you have it: Between the new Fiji GPU and the inclusion of HBM, AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X enters the rarefied air of single-GPU cards capable enough to play games at 4K resolutions with high graphics detail settings enabled--an exclusive club contai...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-14, Author: Koh , review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • Liquid cooling loop means card runs very cool, Quiet operation, Frontplate can be removed and customized, Slightly more affordable than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
  • Performance still trails NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, Compact card, but installing the radiator needs some consideration
  • If not for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, the AMD Radeon R9 Fury X would be far easier to recommend.AMD needs a win with the Radeon R9 Fury X. No company wants to always be seen as the budget and value-for-money option, and the Fury X is supposed to be AM...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2015-07-10, Author: Vinu , review by: tbreak.ae

  • Impressive performance, Liquid cooled, Intriguing design, 4K Gaming
  • Drivers need work, Not as fast as GTX 980 Ti

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-02, Author: Isidro , review by: muycomputer.com

  • Abstract:  Los chicos de TechSpot han publicado un excelente análisis de rendimiento de Mass Effect Andromeda, uno de los juegos más esperados del año. En su artículo han utilizado un total de 24 tarjetas gráficas de diferentes generaciones.Es una lástima que no ha...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-11-23, Author: Isidro , review by: muycomputer.com

  • Abstract:  Los chicos de TechSpot han publicado un excelente análisis de rendimiento de Mass Effect Andromeda, uno de los juegos más esperados del año. En su artículo han utilizado un total de 24 tarjetas gráficas de diferentes generaciones...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 9 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×