au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+

Testseek.com have collected 56 expert reviews of the AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+ and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Phenom X3 8750 2.4GHz Socket AM2+.
 
(67%)
56 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 56

The editors liked

  • Three cores
  • AM2+
  • 2MB L3 cache
  • Integrated memory controller

The editors didn't like

  • Not going to win over any Intel users The Final Word Its not going to get AMD any new users
  • But existing AMD platform users might benefit from the extra upgrade option. On its own
  • The tri-core Phenom X3 8750 is a fast CPU
  • But when its street price ...

 

Reviews

page 4 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-04-23, review by: sharkyextreme.com

  • Betterthan Dual Core Multithreading, Lowerthan Quad Core Power and Thermal Requirements, Good Overclocking, Updated B3 Core, Entrylevel Pricing
  • Lackluster Gaming Performance, 65nm, 2.4 GHz Max Clock
  • The implications of the Phenom X3 8750 launch are very clear, and AMD is providing a "better than dual core" solution to compete directly against Intels Core 2 Duo. This should also ring the dinner bell for systems using the low-cost AMD 780G chipset...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, Author: Mike , review by: icrontic.com

  • Abstract:  AMD Phenom X3 Processors It has been about five months since AMD released their first Phenom quad core processors. The launch was somewhat disappointing in the eyes of many—lower than expected clock speeds and the highly publicized TLB bug cast quite ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, review by: MotherBoards.org

  • From a strict performance point of view the AMD Phenom X3 8750 CPU is not going to win any awards in most cases. The 8750 cannot be compared strictly against the Intel Quad Core CPUs with the exception of the Q6600 which has a nearly similar price poin...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, review by: xbitlabs.com

  • AMD Phenom X3 is definitely a very interesting processor. At least since it is the industry’s first CPU with triple-core sign and monolithic organization. And although it is our first experience with a non-standard processor like that, it didn&rsquo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, review by: amdzone.com

  • AMDs Phenom triple core processors are in a bit of an unusual posistion. The highest-end triple core we reviewed is at a good price at $195 coming in under $200 but for nearly the same price one can pick up a Phenom 9550 which runs 200MHz slower but p...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(91%)
 
  Published: 2008-10-31, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Very fast for certain tasks
  • Two slow on most tasks, Very high power consumption

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-29, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Triple cores break the CPU mould a bit...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-25, review by: techradar.com

  • Unique, Decent multi-threaded performance
  • Weedy single and dual-threaded performer, Not cheap enough
  • Put yourself in AMDs shoes. Things havent been going to plan. Your crucial quad-core chip arrived late, ran slow and had a nasty little hardware bug. Whats more, youre being beaten silly by Intels Core 2 processors. What do you do? How about a tri...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-23, review by: HEXUS.net

  • In November 2007, we concluded that AMDs Phenom X4 9600 was no match for Intels Core 2 Quad Q6600. In April 2008, we concluded that AMDs improved Phenom X4 9850 was no match for Intels Core 2 Quad Q6600. Today, were having to conclude that AMDs t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2005-01-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Last month we looked at AMDs flagship Phenom X4 9850 processor. Now its the turn of the X3 8750, the fastest of AMDs new triple-core range. Its tempting to think of these as quad-core processors with a failed core, because thats what they are. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
    page 4 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×