au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 266 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8350 4.0GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded July 2015
July 2015
 
(79%)
266 Reviews
Users
(93%)
2719 Reviews
79 0 100 266

The editors liked

  • Good stable overclock
  • Great multitreaded performance
  • Good value for money

The editors didn't like

  • Singlethreaded performance not great

 

Reviews

page 5 of 27
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, review by: futurelooks.com

  • This is one of those occasions where AMD has done their job well, but we can’t really celebrate quite yet. The new flagship AMD FX-8350 “Vishera” definitively takes the title of champion amongst AMD processors. The Phenom II 1100T 6-core CPU can’t even...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Victor , review by: Bjorn3d.com

  • Piledriver is what Bulldozer should have been in the first place. The FX-8350 puts AMD back on track, but not yet back in the game. If it were not for Intel's exceptional high IPC and performance per watts ratio on Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge, AMD's Vishera/P...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Chris , review by: tomshardware.com

  • We ran her through the twisties. We did the drag racing. We measured her mileage. We even popped her hood to figure out what makes this little speedster tick. In every way, today's FX-8350 is better than the FX-8150 that preceded it. Faster. More efficien...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Scott , review by: Techreport.com

  • You've probably gathered that the FX-8350 improves on its Bulldozer-based precursor pretty handily for a chip that's neither a die shrink nor an all-new architecture. The final verdict on the FX-8350 isn't terribly difficult to render, but it does have s...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, review by: hardwaresecrets.com

  • Abstract:  Today, AMD is releasing its second-generation of FX CPUs, dubbed “Vishera.” The FX-8350 is currently the highest-end model available, running at 4 GHz and costing USD 195. Let’s see how it fares against its main competitor, the Core i5-3470 (3.2 GHz, U...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, review by: hardocp.com

  • While AMD is trying to make a value statement with its new FX-8350 (selling for $219 at time of publication), it simply will not be able to do so in the enthusiast arena. Perhaps, if we find that the $169 FX-8320 turns out to be a healthy overclocker, it...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-03-14, Author: Paul , review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • As we noted in the AMD Ryzen 7 1800X CPU Review, gaming is a mixed bag for AMD. Some titles respond well to the new architecture, while most others still require optimization of some sort. Where those optimizations will focus remains a question mark...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-12-01, Author: admin , review by: homemediaportal.com

  • Our AMD FX 8350 review showed that this is a great CPU for any desktop PC build. What stands out is the level of performance you get for the money. Being the first desktop CPU to offer 8 physical cores the level of multitasking that comes with this proces...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-07-14, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-23, Author: admin , review by: digitalmediaandit.com

  • Abstract:  Currently working with computers, I've studied IT for 1 Year, did IT back in my Highschool days, and been using computers since the day i can remember. Over a decade and a half experience with Computer hardware and software, out of my friends and family i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 5 of 27 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 27   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×