au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Athlon X4 860K 3.7Ghz Black Edition Socket FM2+



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Athlon X4 860K 3.7Ghz Black Edition Socket FM2+

Testseek.com have collected 56 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon X4 860K 3.7Ghz Black Edition Socket FM2+ and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon X4 860K 3.7Ghz Black Edition Socket FM2+.
 
(74%)
56 Reviews
Users
(90%)
342 Reviews
74 0 100 56

 

Reviews

page 5 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2019-11-30, review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Dat Intel de snelste processors maakt, is anno 2015 een open deur. Maar heeft het ook de beste processor wanneer je 50, 100 of 150 euro wilt uitgeven? Om die vraag te beantwoorden hebben wij bijna alle courante AMD en Intel desktopprocessors (57 stuks!) getest...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-04-07, Author: Tomas , review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Dat Intel de snelste processors maakt, is anno 2015 een open deur. Maar heeft het ook de beste processor wanneer je 50, 100 of 150 euro wilt uitgeven? Om die vraag te beantwoorden hebben wij bijna alle courante AMD en Intel desktopprocessors (57 stuks!)...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-07-02, Author: Gastauteur , review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Dat Intel de snelste processors maakt, is anno 2015 een open deur. Maar heeft het ook de beste processor wanneer je 50, 100 of 150 euro wilt uitgeven? Om die vraag te beantwoorden hebben wij bijna alle courante AMD en Intel desktopprocessors (57 stuks!) getest...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-05-23, Author: Koen , review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Dat Intel de snelste processors maakt, is anno 2015 een open deur. Maar heeft het ook de beste processor wanneer je 50, 100 of 150 euro wilt uitgeven? Om die vraag te beantwoorden hebben wij bijna alle courante AMD en Intel desktopprocessors (57 stuks!)...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-01-10, Author: 组装电脑网 , review by: lotpc.com

  • 对于办公人员来说,虽然AMD速龙X4 860K无论是在核心数量、处理器频率,以及实际应用表现上,都要略好于G4500平台,但是考虑到860K没有内置核显,需要添加一款独显,因此建议使用intel平台。而如果你是一个主流网游用户,需要搭配一款独显,那么建议搭配AMD平台。...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-04-30, Author: 组装电脑网 , review by: lotpc.com

  • Abstract:  在 组装电脑 时,很多人常常在选择处理器犯愁,比如Intel酷睿i3 4170和860k哪个好?我们知道,在目前的主流装机中,这两款无疑是当前最热门的处理器,确实很多电脑小白容易纠结的问题,下面装机之家介绍下,希望对大家有所帮助!我们先来看看这两款CPU的参数吧。Intel酷睿i3 4170处理器参数:i3-4170是一款intel发布的双核四线程酷睿处理器,默认主频3.7Ghz,拥有3M三级缓存,基于LGA 1150插槽,单核优化出色,制作工艺为22纳米,CPU架构为四代haswell,内置Intel...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-26, Author: pconline , review by: sosol.com.cn

  • 领先于奔腾G3258有30%左右的水平,成为当之无愧500元以下级别最佳选择。1、竞争力分析性能上默认频率3.7-4.0GHz,综合性能比奔腾G3258强,但两者超频至4.5GHz后(860K有掉频)性能不相伯仲;价格上AMD 官方定价为499元,某电商新品上市售价进一步降低至449元。功耗上功耗并不是新速龙四核 860K的主要卖点,Intel 产品在这方面还是具有一贯的优势。超频能力超频成绩提升有限,呆呆主板厂商调整BIOS后进一步测试。如果把新速龙四核 860K看作入门市场CPU性能的标杆尺,那么入门...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-12, review by: yesky.com

  • 全面的性能提升(作者深水之下责任编辑李炎)天极新媒体 最酷科技资讯扫码赢大奖评论* 网友发言均非本站立场,本站不在评论栏推荐任何网店、经销商,谨防上当受骗!AMD速龙II X4 750K产品信息报价图片评测CPU主频3.4GHz核心代号Trinity核心数四核心制造工艺32纳米热设计功耗100W最大睿频4GHz查看更多参数查看更多产品网上商城商品促销价格相关文章再见Intel 锐龙 AMD Ryzen发布 8核仅2499起相关报价CPU报价品牌 Intel AMD 价格类型 500元以下 500-700元...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-09-12, Author: 陈骋 , review by: pcpop.com

  • Abstract:  泡泡网CPU频道9月12日 在两个月前的ChinaJoy期间, AMD 公布了两款新品桌面 处理器 ,一个是八核新的低功耗FX-8300,另外一个就是没有GPU的APU:四核速龙860K。得益于APU这几年大行其道,在性价比方面有突出优势,速龙处理器也有了更好的发挥空间。速龙四核860K采用 双模 块四核心的设计的压路机架构核心,默认频率达到了3.7GHz,在Turbo Core机制下更能冲刺到4.0GHz,与当今旗舰级APU A10 7850K一致,同时860K还具备黑盒带K不锁倍频的功能,方便超频玩家...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-07-06, review by: benchmark.pl

  • Abstract:  DirectX 12 na dobre zadomowił się na rynku - choć produkcji napisanych wyłącznie pod niego nadal nie ma zbyt wiele, to jest to wyłącznie kwestia czasu. Wiele zapowiedzianych już dużych premier będzie wspierało wyłącznie DirectX 12. Dziś sprawdzamy na jaki...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 5 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×