au.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4

Testseek.com have collected 348 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 5 1600X 3.6GHz Socket AM4.
Award: Editor’s Choice April 2017
April 2017
 
(88%)
348 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
88 0 100 348

The editors liked

  • Solid Multi-Core performance
  • 1600X is close to 1700 in performance
  • Both are suitable for gaming
  • 1600X is also a good option for content creation
  • New AM4 platform
  • Wide range of motherboards available
  • Great Value for money at the current prices
  • Good
  • Good value
  • Amazing multicore and multithread performance

The editors didn't like

  • Overclocking with the Wraith coolers was limited
  • Intel more widelysupported for games

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 8 of 35
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-03-23, Author: Reinoud , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Which processor now offers the most bang of your buck varies per price segment. If you have a very small budget, in our opinion it is best to find an Intel Pentium G4560, which, given its higher availability, is less of a challenge than it was a few month...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-12-05, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • There are now two great gaming CPU lines available for the core gamer. The overwhelming weight of the data points to Ryzen 5 as the best buy in this market segment, specifically the non-X 1600 model. It's especially compelling against the only two locked...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-09, Author: Tomas , review by: uk.hardware.info

  • AMD Ryzen 5 vs. Intel Core i5 in games: the conclusionWhich CPU is the best choice for gaming?By Tomas Hochstenbach Wednesday 9 August 2017 07:13IntroductionEver since the launch of Ryzen the gaming performance of AMD's new processors has...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-08-07, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net

  • There are now two great gaming CPU lines available for the core gamer. The overwhelming weight of the data points to Ryzen 5 as the best buy in this market segment, specifically the non-X 1600 model. It's especially compelling against the only two locked...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-07, Author: Dave , review by: pcgamesn.com

  • Put simply the Ryzen 5 1600X is a far more significant processor than any of the octa-core Ryzen 7 CPUs, and for us gamers arguably the most significant chip AMD have ever made.This is where AMD have got a far more balanced competitor for Intel's chips, m...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-05-03, Author: Andrew , review by: techteamgb.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Stock speeds for CPU + 2933MHz @1.4V DRAM @15-15-15-36Overclocked to 4GHz @ 1.425V (1.1V SOC) + 2933MHz @1.4V DRAM @15-15-15-36Can the AMD Ryzen 5 1600X defeat the Intel i5 7600K? I think so. This budget 6 core CPU is a real game changer for those low bud...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(98%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-13, Author: Jim , review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • Although a little more expensive than the i5-7600K, it's easy to see that the Ryzen 5 1600X is better value for demanding tasks such as 3D- and video rendering, video editing and compressing and decompressing files. The Intel chip still has an advantage f...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-12, Author: Kevin , review by: techradar.com

  • Awesome multi-core performance, Strong gaming performance, Cool running chip
  • Tricky overclocking
  • The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X isn't a just an affordable chip for gamers and media creators, it an incredible package that puts multi-core computing on the mainstream map...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2017-04-12, Author: Luke , review by: kitguru.net

  • Superb multi-threaded computational performance that obliterates the Core i5-7600K, Multi-threaded performance makes the i7-7700K and i7-6800K look like poor value for money, Plenty of spare computational capacity for game streamers, Power consumption num
  • Gaming performance is not as strong as Intel's competition, which is disappointing for this market segment, Kaby Lake competition has significantly better single-threaded performance, Maximum frequency achievable is limited, especially compared to Intel's
  • With Ryzen 5, AMD builds upon the foundations set by the flagship 8C16T Ryzen 7 processors, and that's generally a good thing.Performance in multi-threaded workloads is in a different league to Intel's price-comparable competitor processors. Ryzen 5 happi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
    page 8 of 35 « Previous   1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 35   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×